During
the period of tooth replacement in children, whether the incisors erupt
properly is often one of the greatest concerns for parents. In some cases, a
child’s tooth may fail to erupt on time. This is not always due to delayed
development—it may indicate an obstruction to normal tooth eruption.
Xiao-An,
a 7-year-10-month-old child, visited the pediatric dental clinic accompanied by
his mother. The chief complaint was that his upper left front tooth had not
erupted. The parents were worried, and the child felt self-conscious about
smiling due to the missing tooth. The parents reported that the right central
incisor had already erupted, but the left side showed no signs of eruption,
prompting them to seek further evaluation.
Eruption Disturbance of Incisors
Generally,
the maxillary central incisors erupt between the ages of 7 and 9. If one
incisor has erupted for more than six months while the contralateral tooth has
not, an eruption disturbance should be suspected.
Upon
examination, Xiao-An was diagnosed with a typical eruption disturbance of the
incisor. His facial proportions were generally normal, with no signs of midface
deficiency. The lips were in an ideal position, and the facial profile appeared
balanced.
There are
many possible causes of eruption failure, including supernumerary teeth
(accounting for 42–62% of cases), severe tooth displacement, cysts or odontomas
causing impaction, retained primary teeth, root dilaceration or ankylosis, and
excessively thick gingival or periodontal tissue.
Clinical
and radiographic examinations revealed that Xiao-An had an odontoma located
beneath the upper left central incisor, blocking its normal eruption path—this
represents a localized pathological factor. Space analysis also showed that
there was only about 8 mm of space available in the upper left incisor region,
whereas studies suggest that at least 9 mm is typically required for eruption
of a central incisor. Therefore, insufficient space was also a contributing
factor.
A
preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was recommended to
confirm the position. Under general anesthesia, the odontoma was surgically
removed, and local orthodontic treatment (2×3 appliance) was used to create
space. The plan was to observe for one year to allow for possible spontaneous
eruption of the permanent tooth.
Unfortunately,
even after removal of the odontoma and space creation, the tooth did not erupt
spontaneously. After discussion with the parents, a more active combined
surgical and orthodontic approach was chosen.
Closed Eruption Technique
Due to
the deep position of the impacted upper left incisor, a closed eruption
technique combined with orthodontic treatment was performed.
Studies suggest
that the closed eruption technique results in better gingival height,
periodontal condition, and pulp vitality. In contrast, the open eruption
technique may lead to longer clinical crowns and reduced bone support.
During
surgery, the gingiva was reflected, and a stainless steel chain was bonded to
the surface of the impacted tooth and connected to the main orthodontic
archwire. The gingiva was then repositioned and sutured. Orthodontic forces
were subsequently applied to gently and continuously guide the tooth downward.
After
eruption, further orthodontic techniques were used to adjust the tooth’s
position and angulation. Initial alignment was achieved using small-diameter
nickel-titanium wires, followed by stainless steel wires for more stable control.
A “double force system” was also employed, applying both main and auxiliary
forces to ensure proper angulation and direction during traction. Finally,
gingival recontouring was performed to achieve a more natural appearance.
At the
completion of treatment, Xiao-An’s incisor successfully erupted and aligned
properly. The occlusion was stable, the appearance was natural, and there was a
healthy amount of keratinized gingiva and bone support. Both the patient and
his parents were very satisfied with the outcome.
Advice from Pediatric Dentists
Early
orthodontic treatment in children is generally considered interceptive
orthodontics. Its purpose is to intervene during the mixed dentition stage
(approximately ages 7–11), taking advantage of the plasticity of skeletal
growth to guide dental and jaw development. Unlike adult orthodontics, the goal
is not necessarily to achieve perfect tooth alignment and jaw relationships.
In
addition to eruption disturbances, early orthodontic treatment can address
issues such as guiding jaw growth, correcting anterior and posterior crossbites
(to prevent jaw asymmetry), managing severe protrusion or deep bite (to reduce
the risk of trauma to front teeth), expanding the dental arch to create space
for permanent teeth, and correcting harmful oral habits that may affect jaw
development.
However,
orthodontic treatment typically takes a long time (1.5–2 years) and may be
uncomfortable. In more complex cases requiring conventional braces, maintaining
oral hygiene can also be challenging. Children need sufficient motivation to
complete treatment successfully, which requires cooperation among the child,
parents, and dentist.
We
hope every child can have healthy teeth and a beautiful smile—let’s work
together, dentists and parents alike, to achieve this goal!